THE FACTS
The debate on the budget estimates for 2008, launched during the session of the City Council on Thursday 31 January, has been updated due to the lack of effect after publication of the three-year plan of public works, which constitutes an annex to the budget of previsone . The issue was raised during the session, one of the councilors of the opposition. Although not significant in terms of accounting and administration, the secretary general found, for prudence, to have to recommend the suspension of discussions or pending the commencement of the period. It Thin February 18.
COMMENT
Undoubtedly, there was an error made by someone insufficiently attentive to the importance of the bureaucracy that accompany the approval of the budget. But this is not the point, since there can always be a mistake, especially if you try to do. What was the attitude of despair over a city councilman who has given the court a sort of victory, without realizing that it was not to lose the majority, but unfortunately, once again, the city, deprived of a "normal administrative "which is a prerequisite for capable and transparent administration. Normality that may not make news, but that our city desperately needs. I would rather discuss in one by one on the choices made in drafting the budget, rather than suffer this court that, again, benefits no one and harms the city. But so be it. By resorting to a football example, the opponents with whom we deal seems too much to those players who, unable to play, they just constantly throw the ball out and as far as possible. If you do not play, no marks: and the public suffers!
But do not worry: it is only the first leg. The return will be another story.
